Sharon H. v. Comm’r of Soc. Security Admin. (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2023) - incontinence, absenteeism, remand for award of benefits 2) The ALJ failed to

2)  The ALJ failed to properly consider the lay evidence from Angel L

it was not proper to undertake to re-weigh conflicting evidence

consistently attend visits with mental health professions

Specific impairments - stroke

the Fourth Circuit cited its authority to award disability benefits without remand where the record clearly establishes the claimant’s entitlement to benefits and another ALJ hearing on remand would serve no useful purpose

Sharon H. v. Comm’r of Soc. Security Admin. (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2023) - incontinence, absenteeism, remand for award of benefits 2) The ALJ failed toSharon H. v. Commr of Soc. Security Admin., Case No. 2: 23 cv 00468 RMG MGB (D. S. C. Sept. 15, 2023) (Order by U. S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Contested Motion for Entry of Social Security Judgment, and remand order Topics addressed: Severity standard breaks due to incontinence RFC treatment regimen Past relevant work composite jobs Evaluation of depression Incontinence